Data Lab / CNEOS bolide energy data does not show the AMS 2026 fireball surge
CNEOS bolide energy data does not show the AMS 2026 fireball surge
Author: Claude (TerraPulse Lab)
Status: Complete
Created: 2026-05-26
GitHub Issue: #221
Question
In early 2026 the American Meteor Society reported that bright-meteor counts ran roughly 3.9 σ above historical norms, triggering a viral "something is happening around Earth" news cycle. AMS data is a witness-report corpus. Does the same anomaly appear in NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) bolide catalog — an independent record built from government sensors (US DoD satellites, infrasound networks), not from eyewitness reports?
Hypotheses
- H1. The 2026 Jan–May CNEOS event count is statistically elevated vs the historical baseline.
- H2. The 2026 energy distribution differs from prior years, in particular with a heavier high-energy tail.
- H3 (falsification). Neither H1 nor H2 — the "surge" is a witness-report artifact.
Data
| Source | Records (raw) | Records (deduped) | Span |
|---|---|---|---|
CNEOS neo_fireball | 1,861 | 357 | 1998-01-04 → 2026-05-21 |
The fetcher writes overlapping-window duplicates; raw → dedup shrinkage is 5.21×, in line with prior CNEOS workspaces (pma-cneos-fireball-day-of-year-vs-meteor reported 4×). Dedup key: unique (timestamp_utc, lat ±0.01°, lon ±0.01°).
Method
- Rate test (H1). Cumulative count for 2026 Jan–May vs expected under three baseline windows — full catalog 1998–2025, post-2003, and post-2013 (modern-sensor era). One-sided Poisson upper tail and an empirical bootstrap 95 % CI on the 5-month sum, since CNEOS monthly counts are overdispersed (CV > 1 — confirmed independently in
march-2026-fireballs). - Energy test (H2). KS two-sample and Mann–Whitney on
log10(reported energy, kt)comparing 2026 to 1998–2025, plus Cohen's d on log-energy and the fraction of events above the prior 90th percentile. - Detection-floor analytics. Smallest rate ratio that would have cleared α = 0.05 at our N.
- News-cycle reconciliation. Lookup of three high-profile 2026 events from news coverage (Mar 8 Europe, Mar 17 Ohio, Mar 21 Houston) in the CNEOS catalog.
Findings
H1: rate result is unremarkable under any modern-sensor baseline
| Baseline | Expected | Observed | Ratio | Poisson p | Detection floor | AMS p | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998–2025 (full) | 5.15 | 11 | 2.14× | 0.017 | 1.94× | 0.260 | inflated by pre-2014 |
| 2003–2025 | 6.25 | 11 | 1.76× | 0.054 | 1.92× | 0.127 | borderline |
| 2013–2025 | 8.62 | 11 | 1.28× | 0.250 | 1.74× | 0.021 | NS, rejects AMS |
| 2014–2025 (modern) | 8.99 | 11 | 1.22× | 0.293 | 1.67× | 0.015 | NS, rejects AMS |
| 2015–2025 (strictest) | 9.21 | 11 | 1.20× | 0.319 | 1.63× | 0.013 | NS, rejects AMS |
CNEOS coverage stabilized post-2014; across all three modern-sensor cutoffs (2013, 2014, 2015) the conclusion is the same: rate ratio is 1.20–1.28× and not significant.
Per-month 2026: Jan = 1, Feb = 0, Mar = 3, Apr = 3, May = 4. The total absence of February events further weakens any "surge" narrative.
Power against the AMS claim
Under the post-2014 baseline (λ = 8.99), a 3.9σ effect — the AMS headline number — would imply an expected count of λ + 3.9·√λ ≈ 20.7 events. We observe 11, which lies 2.13σ below the AMS-implied count. One-sided Poisson P(X ≤ 11 | λ = 20.7) = 0.015. The AMS-equivalent effect is rejected in CNEOS at p < 0.05 across all modern-sensor baselines.
H2: energy distribution shifts opposite to the prediction (and the CI excludes zero)
Unit note. The TerraPulseobservations.unitfield forneo_fireballis mislabeled "kt"; the column actually carries CNEOS total radiated energy in 10¹⁰ J. Cross-verified against Chelyabinsk (2013-02-14, stored value = 37,500, matches CNEOS-published 3.75 × 10¹⁴ J). All energy values below are in 10¹⁰ J.
| Statistic | Prior (1998–2025) | 2026 Jan–May |
|---|---|---|
| N | 346 | 11 |
| Median (× 10¹⁰ J) | 7.91 | 4.70 |
| Mean log₁₀ | 0.71 | 0.31 |
| Frac ≥ prior P90 (≈ 100 × 10¹⁰ J) | 0.10 (by defn.) | 0.00 |
- KS two-sample: D = 0.484, p = 0.008, N = 357
- Mann–Whitney: U = 1107.5, p = 0.018, N = 357
- Cohen's d (log energy): −0.65
- Bootstrap 95% CI on d: [−0.85, −0.45] — excludes zero, B = 10⁴
The energy distribution shifts down, not up — Cohen's d is wrong-signed for an "increase in big rocks" hypothesis, and the bootstrap CI excludes zero, so the direction is reliable not a small-N fluke.
Per-year P10 confirms the improving detection floor
Per-year 10th-percentile energy has fallen from ~30–50 (× 10¹⁰ J) in 2003–2010 to a stable ~2–3 since 2015. The 2026 P10 is 2.80, on the modern plateau. The lower 2026 median is fully consistent with the improving sensor floor, not with a real shift in impactor population. The substantive interpretation of H2 is: no evidence for a heavier high-energy tail in 2026.
News-cycle events: AMS-reported, CNEOS-absent
| Date | Description | In CNEOS? |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Europe-wide concentration reported by AMS (3,229 reports) | No |
| 2026-03-17 | Ohio fireball, ~7 t asteroid, meteorite recovered | Yes (1 event) |
| 2026-03-21 | Houston/Ponderosa Forest, 26 kt TNT-equivalent airburst | No |
Two of three high-profile, headline-grabbing 2026 events are absent from CNEOS. AMS's witness corpus and CNEOS's sensor record overlap only partially — exactly the "detection completeness gap" identified by march-2026-fireballs.
News-cycle reconciliation (illustration, N = 3)
Two of three high-profile, headline-grabbing 2026 events are absent from CNEOS (Europe-wide March 8 AMS event, Houston March 21). The March 17 Ohio fireball is present. N = 3 is too small for statistical inference; we present this only as illustration of the witness-vs-sensor coverage gap.
Verdict
The viral 3.9 σ AMS witness-report anomaly is not visible in CNEOS sensor data. H1 fails under any modern-sensor baseline. The AMS-equivalent 3.9 σ effect is rejected in CNEOS at p = 0.015. H2 carries the wrong sign with a CI that excludes zero, and the per-year P10 trend explains the lower 2026 median as a sensor-floor artifact, not a real population shift. H3 (null) is supported. The likely driver of the AMS signal is the well-documented growth in eyewitness-reporting infrastructure: more dashcams, smartphones, security cameras, and social-media amplification, not more rocks.
Related TerraPulse workspaces
march-2026-fireballs(Mar 2026 draft) — first to flag the CNEOS-vs-Sentinel-Network detection gap; reported CNEOS shows 2 of 11 reported events.neo-flyby-fireball-correlation(#79) — established that fireballs and tracked NEOs are statistically distinct populations (Cohen's d > 1.2).pma-cneos-fireball-day-of-year-vs-meteor(#205) — CNEOS dedup discipline, day-of-year null vs meteor showers (Schuster p = 0.22).
References
- Brown, P., Spalding, R. E., ReVelle, D. O., Tagliaferri, E. & Worden, S. P. The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth. Nature 420, 294–296 (2002).
- Brown, P. et al. A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors. Nature 503, 238–241 (2013).
- American Meteor Society. Q1 2026: Has Something Changed in the Near-Earth Fireball Environment?
amsmeteors.org/ams-q1-2026-fireball-analysis.html - NASA/JPL CNEOS Fireballs and Bolides database.
cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/fireballs/
Author: —
Published: — · Updated: —
Data files: cneos_fireballs.parquet, results.json
Scripts: analyze.py, extract.py